1-Any revolutionary knows that the bourgeois democracy is actually a
dictatorship of the bourgeoisie on the proletariat. The use of the term
"democracy" is nothing but a scam. In times of political crisis,
mainly economic, the bourgeoisie is
usually give up this facade of "democracy" and appeal to a
Bonapartist regime or openly fascist.
2-The elections within the bourgeois democracy
are a gigantic fraud. They are financed by the companies and corporations, i.e.
the bourgeoisie finances its candidates, because an election campaign has very
high financial costs. The bourgeoisie does not care to finance candidates
pseudo-leftists like (PT-PSOL-in Brazil)
or the PS in France or the so-called Popular Fronts, they know that once
elected these pseudo lefties will rule for themselves, the bourgeoisie.
3-The global economic crisis wich started in
2008 does not allow the world bourgeoisie, especially in semicoloniais
countries, such as Egypt, to give any
economic concession to workers.
4-The mass of workers in Egypt overthrew the
Government of Mubarack in a incomplete revolutionary uprising process.
Incomplete because this same mass still have democratic illusions.This due to a
lack of leadership of a mass
revolutionary party, with a revolutionary internationalist program. This made
it possible for the bourgeoisie to drive what could be a truly revolutionary
process directly to the illusion of bourgeois democracy. In the context of
Egypt's history of the last 60 years are the military the rulers of the regime
to the bourgeoisie in the form of a military dictatorship, adopting a
pró-imperialista approach with Anwar Al Sadat in the 70s and
continued by Mubarack. The military never ceased to have strong influence, even
with the fall of Mubarack and the subsequent convening of bourgeois democratic
elections that had follow with the election of Mursi, a representative of the
Muslim Brotherhood, in June 2012.
5-Revolutionaries had No illusions that the
Muslim Brotherhood would make a democratic Government, even along the lines of
bourgeois democracy. The Islamists
have lack the subtlety needed
to feel that his policy could not be imposed the same reality of a theocratic
Government of Iran's model in the Arab world and Egypt that have became a powder keg since the beginning of the so
called Arab spring. Egypt today is an explosive mixture divided among a mass of
supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood who see Iran as a model to be followed and
other mass frankly hostile to a dictatorial theocratic
government, but that mass can't see that bourgeois democracy is another form of
dictatorship, and that especially in times of global economic crisis, will not meet their needs to decrease social
inequalities, poverty, unemployment, etc.
6-But even the so-called bourgeois democracy is
not the reality of the current Egypt. We must call it what really happened in
Egypt: a military coup. This is something that we inhabitants of Latin America
we recognize very well. In this characterization we don't fit any support for
the Muslim Brotherhood, but the last thing that the working Egyptians masses
needed is the "protection" of a military coup.
7-Even Obama, who denies, the military coup had widespread support from
the U.S. Government, as it is free of
Mursi, a sympathizer of Iran's regime, an ally of Hezbollah and Hamas, and at
the same time the U.S. guarantees to Israel security on the border with Egypt,
as well as had already done the military dictatorship under the regime of
Mubarack. The irony is that the Assad regime in Syria has given support to the
coup, but this can be explained by the fact that most of the rebels in war
against Assad are Islamists.
8-But the Muslim Brotherhood is almost
centenary (since 1928), they suffered
several setbacks under the Governments of Nasser, Sadat and Mubarack , and
still reached the Presidency competing against secular parties. There is no
evidence that the brotherhood will kick in their struggle to demand the return
of Mursi, so as there is no evidence that the military and the sectors that are
composing the new provisional Government will give up something. The conclusion
is that the crisis is likely to increase and may develop into a civil war.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário